Post by New York Yankees on Sept 19, 2017 6:22:37 GMT -5
With the veto process we have currently in effect weren't the non-votes counted as in favor of the trade? I know I saw one with more vetoes than in favor and it was passed under that assumption, so if that's the case then leave it like that.
Post by Miami Marlins on Sept 19, 2017 9:05:23 GMT -5
I think there needs to be another trade arbitrator. Three is a good number. 2 of 3 approves or disapproves. And it can be done in one day. In the case of the Commish and Grey, the third party would make the call. As for reasoning out a "No" veto...It can always be sent to the arbitrators in hopes of influencing them.
Chicago White Sox: How did you come up with Arbitration numbers again?
Sept 28, 2019 22:06:58 GMT -5
New York Mets: I think I only saw 1 poll were there others? Also when can we post off season discussion topics?
Oct 2, 2019 20:02:09 GMT -5
Oakland Athletics: CWS: See Rule 104 Which is located under minor league rules. NYM: Not sure what poll you are talking about, and Offseason discussion have begun, I would have liked to moved on from them already so we can enjoy our break season
Oct 4, 2019 23:21:41 GMT -5
Oakland Athletics: But I have been to busy lately so I just got rosters in order for next season.
Oct 4, 2019 23:22:17 GMT -5
New York Yankees: So from what I am reading if anyone has an offseason discussion topic we post it under offseason discussions?
Oct 7, 2019 14:06:22 GMT -5
Colorado Rockies: Offseason discussion seems so, I think I would recommend emailing also, as some owners have already begun hibernating
Oct 8, 2019 4:29:48 GMT -5
Colorado Rockies: I think OAK, the polls NYM is asking about are best trade, best gm those.
Oct 8, 2019 4:33:54 GMT -5