Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2019 16:23:00 GMT -5
I think that we should discuss in the offseason about whether death of a player should release you of the contract
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2019 18:07:06 GMT -5
I feel like this rule covers it though. (I'd consider it involuntary retirement)
64 – a player who has officially retired, for whatever reason, either voluntarily or involuntarily, may be dropped from your active roster at any time for zero cap hit, regardless of that player’s remaining contract length and salary. If a manager drops such a player, and that player then reverses his decision to retire and carries on playing, then the manager who dropped the player is not liable for any backdated cap penalty, providing the drop was made before the player announced his intention to continue playing.
|
|
|
Post by Baltimore Orioles on Jul 29, 2019 18:28:59 GMT -5
Yep that pretty much explains it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2019 18:32:06 GMT -5
Yet KC must pay for Skaggs this year, though
|
|
|
Post by Oakland Athletics on Jul 29, 2019 18:36:56 GMT -5
Yes I believe it’s pretty clear Skaggs was an involuntary retirement.So TOR will not be penalized. It was my mistake for adding a penalty, I did it just out of habit. But I will remove it now. As KC said Rule 64 pretty much covers the death of a player.
|
|
|
Post by Oakland Athletics on Sept 27, 2019 11:59:58 GMT -5
Hey guys so once scenario I would like to discuss to see what y’all think. Felipe Vasquez looks like he has thrown his last baseball as he faces criminal charges and possible deportation. I would believe this falls under the category of Involuntary retirement such as Rule 64 points out therefore the owner would be allowed to drop him for no penalty. We don’t necessarily have something concrete for this because it’s a little different than the death of a player.
What’s your opinion on this? Should the owner be able to drop Vasquez if he’s convicted and/or deported?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 16:45:27 GMT -5
I feel like that’s a fine rule, and that it would be fair for league staff to make a case by case judgment call on these situations
|
|
|
Post by Baltimore Orioles on Sept 29, 2019 19:49:30 GMT -5
It's no way anyone could have predicted him to forced out of baseball like this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2019 11:04:09 GMT -5
I think in these cases by all means the team shouldn't be forced to lose money it's bad enough they are losing the player
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2019 11:09:27 GMT -5
They should be able to drop him free of charge
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2019 10:26:11 GMT -5
I'd consider him an involuntary retirement.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2019 11:57:47 GMT -5
The free agent penalty is bad enough a passing should be free of charge
|
|
|
Post by LA Dodgers on Dec 4, 2019 9:02:16 GMT -5
So what is the final decision on the child molester Felipe Vazquez? With 21 felony counts against him, I think he's done with baseball.
|
|
|
Post by Oakland Athletics on Dec 9, 2019 23:06:10 GMT -5
So what is the final decision on the child molester Felipe Vazquez? With 21 felony counts against him, I think he's done with baseball. Don't think he's ever going to play in the mlb again. I believe this falls in line with an involuntary retirement, everyone seems to be in agreement on that so if you would like to drop him you can for no penalty.
|
|
|
Post by Cleveland Indians on Dec 12, 2019 12:39:52 GMT -5
I would agree with that ruling. The spirit of the rule is to protect the owner against these type of situations even if the situation isn't verbatim written out.
|
|